<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dov Charney and Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a Jewish Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northern Gateway Pipeline hearings: Old and tired? &#8216;Hijack&#8217;. New hotness? &#8216;Mob&#8217;! &#124; Five Feet of Fury</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1917006</link>
		<dc:creator>Northern Gateway Pipeline hearings: Old and tired? &#8216;Hijack&#8217;. New hotness? &#8216;Mob&#8217;! &#124; Five Feet of Fury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1917006</guid>
		<description>[...] which may be &#8220;sweatshop free&#8221; (in a non-union shop) but is run by a creepy man who masturbates in public and started out as a &#8220;scab&#8221;, and uses ads most feminists would find [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which may be &#8220;sweatshop free&#8221; (in a non-union shop) but is run by a creepy man who masturbates in public and started out as a &#8220;scab&#8221;, and uses ads most feminists would find [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Guide to Who&#39;s Screwing Who in American Apparel&#39;s "F--- the People" Ad &#124; BNET Advertising Blog &#124; BNET</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1501972</link>
		<dc:creator>A Guide to Who&#39;s Screwing Who in American Apparel&#39;s "F--- the People" Ad &#124; BNET Advertising Blog &#124; BNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1501972</guid>
		<description>[...] not exactly &#8220;product-focused.&#8221; And the new ad will give everyone cause to remember an infamous interview with Jane magazine in which he pleasured himself in front of the reporter who wrote the article. And that he wanders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not exactly &#8220;product-focused.&#8221; And the new ad will give everyone cause to remember an infamous interview with Jane magazine in which he pleasured himself in front of the reporter who wrote the article. And that he wanders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kosher travel</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1446253</link>
		<dc:creator>kosher travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1446253</guid>
		<description>Has it ever occurred to any of you that there’s no such thing as bad publicity? That knowing the dirt on some company and still liking its products appeals to that perverse but delectable allure of our taboo intuition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has it ever occurred to any of you that there’s no such thing as bad publicity? That knowing the dirt on some company and still liking its products appeals to that perverse but delectable allure of our taboo intuition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Literago &#187; American Apparel Hates Literature</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1350720</link>
		<dc:creator>Literago &#187; American Apparel Hates Literature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1350720</guid>
		<description>[...] let&#8217;s all do coke and masturbate on reporters!   Comments (0)   function fbs_click() [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let&#8217;s all do coke and masturbate on reporters!   Comments (0)   function fbs_click() [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob G</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1126609</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1126609</guid>
		<description>Wealth and hubris can make you eccentric; sometimes it can also make you a sexual predator.  I hope the EEOC investigates this guy and his relationships with employees.  He may have be a great manager but the potential abuse of his power and position violate some basic laws of civil rights and sexual harassment. He should use better judgment and separate his social/sexual needs from his workplace behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wealth and hubris can make you eccentric; sometimes it can also make you a sexual predator.  I hope the EEOC investigates this guy and his relationships with employees.  He may have be a great manager but the potential abuse of his power and position violate some basic laws of civil rights and sexual harassment. He should use better judgment and separate his social/sexual needs from his workplace behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why should you boycot American Apparel? &#171; Boycott American Apparel</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-1118539</link>
		<dc:creator>Why should you boycot American Apparel? &#171; Boycott American Apparel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-1118539</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. &#8220;Don Charney and Google&#8221; “Well, because Dov Charney likes to masturbate. A lot. In front of women. And female reporters. He also has no problem walking around nude or covered by just a small towel. He also likes taking pictures of his scantily clad models. Oh… and he’s slept with his employees.” http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3. &#8220;Don Charney and Google&#8221; “Well, because Dov Charney likes to masturbate. A lot. In front of women. And female reporters. He also has no problem walking around nude or covered by just a small towel. He also likes taking pictures of his scantily clad models. Oh… and he’s slept with his employees.” <a href="http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/'>jewlicious.com...</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dov charney how he started</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-918007</link>
		<dc:creator>dov charney how he started</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-918007</guid>
		<description>[...] What you ... of American Apparel when I was started buying wholesale t-shirts to screen print ...http://www.jewlicious.com/index.php?p=77Jewlicious &amp;187 Blog Archive &amp;187 Dov Charney and GoogleWell, because dov charney likes to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What you &#8230; of American Apparel when I was started buying wholesale t-shirts to screen print &#8230;<a href="http://www.jewlicious.com/index.php?p=77Jewlicious" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.jewlicious.com/index.php?p=77Jewlicious'>jewlicious.com...</a> &#38;187 Blog Archive &#38;187 Dov Charney and GoogleWell, because dov charney likes to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jona</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-898183</link>
		<dc:creator>jona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-898183</guid>
		<description>AA clothing is cheap in every sense of the word.  shit falls apart pronto!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AA clothing is cheap in every sense of the word.  shit falls apart pronto!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8211; Encouraged or Discouraged? &#171; Once there was a girl&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-890803</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8211; Encouraged or Discouraged? &#171; Once there was a girl&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-890803</guid>
		<description>[...] I read an article about it&#8217;s founder in Jane magazine, about how he spoke about suggestive topics and had an assistant help him masturbate during the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read an article about it&#8217;s founder in Jane magazine, about how he spoke about suggestive topics and had an assistant help him masturbate during the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Apparel Sports a Woody: Madness is the Method &#171; Cool Rules Pronto</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-884691</link>
		<dc:creator>American Apparel Sports a Woody: Madness is the Method &#171; Cool Rules Pronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-884691</guid>
		<description>[...] world, is just over the hill from American Apparel&#8217;s headquarters.) It would certainly suit his notorious lifestyle. Charney even looks the part, with his oversized 70s glasses and facial hair. Instead, he makes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] world, is just over the hill from American Apparel&#8217;s headquarters.) It would certainly suit his notorious lifestyle. Charney even looks the part, with his oversized 70s glasses and facial hair. Instead, he makes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierreyann.org &#187; 05-12-2007</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-784000</link>
		<dc:creator>pierreyann.org &#187; 05-12-2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-784000</guid>
		<description>[...] But that&#8217;s ok, coz (it seems, since the source&#8217;s a blog) the interviewer said that &#8220;Dov Charney is a mad man and I like that&#8221;. It reminds me a bit of Sisley adverts. thanks for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But that&#8217;s ok, coz (it seems, since the source&#8217;s a blog) the interviewer said that &#8220;Dov Charney is a mad man and I like that&#8221;. It reminds me a bit of Sisley adverts. thanks for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewlicious &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Could Never be Here Without&#8230; American Apparel</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-760684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewlicious &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Could Never be Here Without&#8230; American Apparel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-760684</guid>
		<description>[...] tone, as if the entire future of the company depended upon increased media exposure on Jewlicious. Dov Charney himself was said to be asking &#8220;So nu? When are they going to write about us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tone, as if the entire future of the company depended upon increased media exposure on Jewlicious. Dov Charney himself was said to be asking &#8220;So nu? When are they going to write about us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOX: Les Petites Mortes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Death to Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-641518</link>
		<dc:creator>BOX: Les Petites Mortes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Death to Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-641518</guid>
		<description>[...] memory of Jane, here are a few of our favorite moments in Jane’s publishing history:  •2004: Dov Charney masturbates through an in-person interview with Jane contributor Claudine Ko. It was amazing. I thought I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] memory of Jane, here are a few of our favorite moments in Jane’s publishing history:  •2004: Dov Charney masturbates through an in-person interview with Jane contributor Claudine Ko. It was amazing. I thought I was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewlicious &#187; Boycott Zionist Apparel! And another Jewlicious Prank!</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-358957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewlicious &#187; Boycott Zionist Apparel! And another Jewlicious Prank!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-358957</guid>
		<description>[...] And how is American Apparel not progressive? They&#8217;re not unionized. American Apparel offered to allow the employees to vote on unionization but the Union refused to accept the offer knowing that they would be trounced. The mostly Latino work force work hard for their money and are not exactly clamoring to give up a chunk of their pay check to a union that couldn&#8217;t possibly give them any more benefits than they already enjoy. They are also distrustful of a labor movement that has traditionally sought to exclude Latinos from the labor market. Their ads are too sexy. Uh&#8230; these people have clearly not opened up a fashion magazine in a long time. It&#8217;s the nature of the beast and even within that context, American Apparel&#8217;s use of real men and women as models flies in the face of Madison Avenue&#8217;s preference for impossibly thin, enhanced and airbrushed depictions of beauty. Dov Charney, head of American Apparel, is a sexual predator. All but one of the lawsuits against him have been dropped and NONE of the lawsuits ever even alleged that Charney sexually propositioned anyone. We could go on and on but feel free to read more about this company on Jewlicious or read the report on the company at knowmore.org. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And how is American Apparel not progressive? They&#8217;re not unionized. American Apparel offered to allow the employees to vote on unionization but the Union refused to accept the offer knowing that they would be trounced. The mostly Latino work force work hard for their money and are not exactly clamoring to give up a chunk of their pay check to a union that couldn&#8217;t possibly give them any more benefits than they already enjoy. They are also distrustful of a labor movement that has traditionally sought to exclude Latinos from the labor market. Their ads are too sexy. Uh&#8230; these people have clearly not opened up a fashion magazine in a long time. It&#8217;s the nature of the beast and even within that context, American Apparel&#8217;s use of real men and women as models flies in the face of Madison Avenue&#8217;s preference for impossibly thin, enhanced and airbrushed depictions of beauty. Dov Charney, head of American Apparel, is a sexual predator. All but one of the lawsuits against him have been dropped and NONE of the lawsuits ever even alleged that Charney sexually propositioned anyone. We could go on and on but feel free to read more about this company on Jewlicious or read the report on the company at knowmore.org. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltDe</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-343648</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltDe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-343648</guid>
		<description>Very good reading. Peace until next time.
WaltDe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good reading. Peace until next time.<br />
WaltDe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-340915</link>
		<dc:creator>themiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-340915</guid>
		<description>Bernard, I have no affiliation with American Apparel nor do their products interest me. Some of my friends here do care about AA, however, so that might have caused me to read your report all the way through. It&#039;s a fascinating and detailed report, and as I was reading it, I was continually surprised and impressed with AA. I was surprised by their openness with workers, by the salaries and benefits, by the foresight to open a dental clinic and consideration of opening a school, by the assistance given with immigration matters, and by the generally benevolent approach to dealing with workers. You mention and quote at length from a letter by an angry employee and then report that she and Charney remain friends. So she wrote a critical letter that received public attention and humiliated the company and he resolved the matter by becoming friendly?! That seems like a fairly progressive and positive stance, doesn&#039;t it?

I was surprised, however, to see your negative rating. I understand a neutral rating or why you would hesitate to give a positive rating since not everything is perfect there. But negative? This is the garment business! This is a sweatshop business and has always been one. In fact, it is so brutal, cutthroat-competitive and price-conscious that most manufacturers no longer manufacture in the US but move to countries where wages are insanely low and the workers have horrible work conditions. Not only does AA continue to employ thousands in the US, but they pay them well, help them with personal issues, attempt to be benefactors to their needs, and seek innovative ways to care for their workers. My source for this information is YOUR REPORT! I am dumbfounded that you consider this to deserve a &quot;negative&quot; rating. I have no idea what your standards are, but I don&#039;t think they are too realistic considering the nature of this business. Charney could run AA in a very different way and should be praised for refraining from doing so. The fact that he openly invited you, as he seems to invite others, to see his operation and openly speak to his workers speaks volumes. Again, I fail to understand the &quot;negative&quot; rating. Can you elaborate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, I have no affiliation with American Apparel nor do their products interest me. Some of my friends here do care about AA, however, so that might have caused me to read your report all the way through. It&#8217;s a fascinating and detailed report, and as I was reading it, I was continually surprised and impressed with AA. I was surprised by their openness with workers, by the salaries and benefits, by the foresight to open a dental clinic and consideration of opening a school, by the assistance given with immigration matters, and by the generally benevolent approach to dealing with workers. You mention and quote at length from a letter by an angry employee and then report that she and Charney remain friends. So she wrote a critical letter that received public attention and humiliated the company and he resolved the matter by becoming friendly?! That seems like a fairly progressive and positive stance, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I was surprised, however, to see your negative rating. I understand a neutral rating or why you would hesitate to give a positive rating since not everything is perfect there. But negative? This is the garment business! This is a sweatshop business and has always been one. In fact, it is so brutal, cutthroat-competitive and price-conscious that most manufacturers no longer manufacture in the US but move to countries where wages are insanely low and the workers have horrible work conditions. Not only does AA continue to employ thousands in the US, but they pay them well, help them with personal issues, attempt to be benefactors to their needs, and seek innovative ways to care for their workers. My source for this information is YOUR REPORT! I am dumbfounded that you consider this to deserve a &#8220;negative&#8221; rating. I have no idea what your standards are, but I don&#8217;t think they are too realistic considering the nature of this business. Charney could run AA in a very different way and should be praised for refraining from doing so. The fact that he openly invited you, as he seems to invite others, to see his operation and openly speak to his workers speaks volumes. Again, I fail to understand the &#8220;negative&#8221; rating. Can you elaborate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard@knowmore.org</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-340894</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard@knowmore.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-340894</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knowmore.org/index.php/American_Apparel%2C_LLC&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;La Compania Rebelde: Understanding American Apparel&lt;/a&gt;



After nearly 6 months of work and hundreds of hours of interviews and research, Knowmore.org is releasing its special report on American Apparel, LLC.

American Apparel is the largest garment manufacturer in the United States, and as of this writing employs roughly 4,500 workers out of a single factory in downtown Los Angeles. Its growth in the past five years has been astonishing; from 2002 to 2004, the company repeatedly doubled its annual sales figures, and has opened 130 retail stores worldwide in the past three years.

The company, which prides itself on its socially responsible practices, has had its ethics called into question by critics who accuse the company of union busting, harmful advertising, creating a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, and managerial misconduct towards workers.

When Knowmore&#039;s American Apparel entry came to the attention of CEO Dov Charney, he called to challenge our representation of his company, and demanded we take a closer look. He also offered us unprecedented access to his factory, workers, and management, which we accepted and engaged.

The result is this report; which represents the most complete Knowmore.org entry to date, and the most comprehensive look at Charney&#039;s controversial company ever published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.knowmore.org/index.php/American_Apparel%2C_LLC" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">La Compania Rebelde: Understanding American Apparel</a></p>
<p>After nearly 6 months of work and hundreds of hours of interviews and research, Knowmore.org is releasing its special report on American Apparel, LLC.</p>
<p>American Apparel is the largest garment manufacturer in the United States, and as of this writing employs roughly 4,500 workers out of a single factory in downtown Los Angeles. Its growth in the past five years has been astonishing; from 2002 to 2004, the company repeatedly doubled its annual sales figures, and has opened 130 retail stores worldwide in the past three years.</p>
<p>The company, which prides itself on its socially responsible practices, has had its ethics called into question by critics who accuse the company of union busting, harmful advertising, creating a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, and managerial misconduct towards workers.</p>
<p>When Knowmore&#8217;s American Apparel entry came to the attention of CEO Dov Charney, he called to challenge our representation of his company, and demanded we take a closer look. He also offered us unprecedented access to his factory, workers, and management, which we accepted and engaged.</p>
<p>The result is this report; which represents the most complete Knowmore.org entry to date, and the most comprehensive look at Charney&#8217;s controversial company ever published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lying Media Bastards &#187; Dirty Laundry</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-334590</link>
		<dc:creator>Lying Media Bastards &#187; Dirty Laundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-334590</guid>
		<description>[...] American Apparel is the company of choice for many progressives out there, due to it&#8217;s non-sweatshop conditions. However, the company is anti-union, its owner has numerous sexual harassment allegations and lawsuits pending against him, and the company&#8217;s advertising is often exploitative of women. From formal and informal sources, it seems like owner Dov Charney is a sleazy motherfucker, who feels that his &#8220;paternal benevolence&#8221; averts the need for his employees to unionize, and that he is really a wannabe porn magnate who happens to be in the clothing business. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American Apparel is the company of choice for many progressives out there, due to it&#8217;s non-sweatshop conditions. However, the company is anti-union, its owner has numerous sexual harassment allegations and lawsuits pending against him, and the company&#8217;s advertising is often exploitative of women. From formal and informal sources, it seems like owner Dov Charney is a sleazy motherfucker, who feels that his &#8220;paternal benevolence&#8221; averts the need for his employees to unionize, and that he is really a wannabe porn magnate who happens to be in the clothing business. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vitals</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-208596</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vitals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-208596</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It certainly sounds as if the rooster is running the henhouse at American Apparel. CEO Dov Charney has been frank (even illustrative!) in interviews about his sexual relationships with his employee-slash-modelswho are, in turn, the stars of another controversy regarding the companys low-fi bedroom aesthetic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik seidenglanz</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2004/08/dov-charney-jane-magazine-and-google/#comment-208326</link>
		<dc:creator>erik seidenglanz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=77#comment-208326</guid>
		<description>DOV CHARNEY giving away trade secrets, and discrimination practices.  no band kids, no studies no anything...  a megolemaniac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOV CHARNEY giving away trade secrets, and discrimination practices.  no band kids, no studies no anything&#8230;  a megolemaniac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

