Your attitude that deporting them is ‘bad strategy’ or ‘it won’t happen.’

You are the reason it won’t happen.

You see if there were more people like me it WOULD HAPPEN.

But since we have nay-saying, goyim-frightened people like you
-it won’t happen.

If you still don’t understand me I can talk even slower.

Believe me I know that they won’t go – but that is only because of Jewish responses like yours.

Jews seem to be quite slow in grasping when their own fate is at stake. It happened before in Europe where they ignored all signs and hoped they would ride it out. There are a lot of bad things coming to us Eli, because we are so stubborn.

2. With the intent of making a political statement or change, or to fulfill or pursue a religious or ideological goal.

Don’t be intimidated by all these responses of those falling over themselves to show ‘equivalency.’

Like I said in another post all this is just diversion like the musicians playing music while the titanic is sinking.

We are being attacked and pushed into a corner. Frusterated people of course react in self-defense. Isn’t it obvious that this would happen?

The point is that Israel is under attack by both arabs and self-hating Jews who both seek to claim that Israel does not belong to us. There is no question that in the end those self-haters will be punished for their role.

Two nations cannot share one land when both claim it as their own. Is it really ours? Of course nevertheless they ‘claim’ it as theirs.

Therefore THEY MUST GO.

The sooner the better for them and for us.

All this Hullabaloo over things like this by Jews is meant to instill more feelings of guilt in order to divert attention from the real threat that hovers over the Jewish people.

Some of those making a Hullabaloo do it on purpose – but some are good people who simply don’t have a clear perspective of what is taking place in the world around them and simply follow the crowd.

terrorism –> terror –> violence committed to intimidate or coerce a population –> to incite FEAR

idiots like this TERRORIST incite fear upon the Arab population of Israel-proper, who are *not* the threat, and are not the source of Arab terrorism.

he makes them fear, he makes us look bad. he’s a terrorist. for you to defend him based on technicalities and the assumption that terror requires a group/infastructure is morally inexcusable.

no more b/s. he’s a terrorist. period.

well, that’s not good enough. i changed my mind. i ranted on and on about how it technically wasn’t terror. but f*ck technicalities. it’s wrong, and if we condemn it we just proove we’re better than them, once again.

they’ll glorify their killers, and we’ll take active steps to seperate ours from society by deeming them terrorists. i like the idea of calling jews who kill arabs (for any reason, except self-defence) terrorists.

i retract all i said before. zada = terrorist. glad they’re changing the law. what was i thinking defending that monster on a technicality? that’s not the jewish way. that’s unkosher.

Listen they are having a technical discussion about terminology. I am just answering according to that.

The real bottom line is that I understand what makes people act like that. I even understand arabs- after all they think Jews are robbers. Thats why of course I realize that one of us Jews or Arabs must go – and of course since we the Jews are the owners the arabs must go.

But since the discussion always gets reduced to these silly arguments of what is a ‘terrorist’ and ‘compensation’ while the main issues are not dealt with and while Israel is on its way under-I guess i’m forced to go along…

Legal Criteria for Designation
(Reflecting Amendments to Section 219 of the INA in the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001)

1. It must be a foreign organization.
2. The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d)(2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
3. The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.

When some Jewish idiot starts shooting at innocent civilians because he’s trying to make a political statement or cause some sort of change in the status quo, how is that different than what a Hamas or Fatah bomber does?