Comments on: Jewish Hostages in Mumbai

By: AJ

AJ — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:10:32 +0000

july_jones, that is exactly what I thought of! I guess History repeats itself. The Torah teaches us this. This baby will be a great new leader someday, and he will do wonderful things in this world. Terrorists are the same as amalek, like Haman, in the Purim story, and Hitler….they need to be killed.

By: july_jones

july_jones — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:04:49 +0000

The story of baby Moshe being rescued by the nanny makes me think of the original story.

By: guest

guest — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:44:36 +0000

When CNN, an American news channel, covers an attack like this, they tend to report on the number of Americans “and other” victims. When Canada covers events in Afghanistan, their media emphasize Canadian soldiers. When a Catholic paper covers a story, they seek to find the Catholic angle on the story or how it affects fellow Catholics.

I don’t understand what is offensive to people about what Dani wrote.

By: Tom Morrissey

Tom Morrissey — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:55:19 +0000

This week’s attack was a consummate success if its perpetrators sought to disfigure the image of their faith. Nice work, gentlemen.

By: Netsach Shebe Netsach

Netsach Shebe Netsach — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:35:14 +0000

Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka

Gave up their lives for the Jewish People.

Not everybody has the resolve or strength
to do like these brave souls did.

Lots of ppl talk, some actually do good
things in this world and have made this
world a better place, even if with
the obvious sacrifice….

By: M.Miller

M.Miller — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:53:51 +0000

I found your site because I wanted to hear more about the American toddler that was rescued by the cook. Guess we all have our labels.

By: Tiff

Tiff — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:26:14 +0000

ds is totally making a valid point. so what if he’s a bit snarky? why write “Jews, Israelis, and other victims”? I would have said, ” all the victims”. But of course, making a list does not imply sequential value. it’s not like Dani said, “Jews, Israelis and other victims, in that order.”it’s the “jews, first and foremost” comment which is most annoying to me. a totally not snarky question here, religiously speaking, is a jewish life always more important than a gentile’s? value out the window? I’m wondering.

By: Tara

Tara — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:21:34 +0000

CK, you and Dani are absolutely right that in this occasion, there is no room for reserving sympathies just for Jewish victims. You have a nice approach and nice comments.

I would add that what you politely term as ethnocentric is often interpreted and indeed often displays itself as chauvinistic and obnoxious. While anti-Semitism stems from a variety of unwarranted accusations, this is the one area that I would identity where Jewish personal interactions may be contributing.

By: ck

ck — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:20:28 +0000

ON THE OTHER HAND… let’s not get all holier than thou when criticizing ds. The notion of the existence of Jewish ethnocentricity is not so outrageous. We often look at issues from the perspective of “is it good for the Jews?” to the exclusion of other considerations. Granted, there are only 15-16 million of us and it’s not wrong to be concerned – many amongst us harbor chauvinistic notions that are often masked by “pro forma” nods to political correctness. I know dani and I know that this wasn’t the case here, but ds did not allude to a notion that is completely outrageous. ds may be snarky, but I’m pretty sure he’s not evil.

By: dani

dani — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:09:09 +0000

Hey everyone, Thanks for backing me up on this one.
Still following the situation, praying that they are alive.
twitter.com/ye...