Comments on: You Made Baby Hitler Cry!

By: xisnotx

xisnotx — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:31:11 +0000

jack-booted gov’t thugs kidnap little adolf:
haaretz.com/ha...

By: froylein

froylein — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:33:55 +0000

x, then you can place the mixed kids at a different table and feed them toasted waffles instead of b’day cake. Later you have them pull up some minstrel show. That’s hands-on teaching right there.

By: xisnotx

xisnotx — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:44:19 +0000

sorry, but what’s the point of being a white supremacist/separatist when you invite “mixed-race” kids to birthday parties? ze furher vould never have done ziss.

By: themiddle

themiddle — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:26:54 +0000

I’ll define “racist” for you: “Steve.”

You’re not welcome here. Leave.

By: Yoni C.

Yoni C. — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:16:18 +0000

Steve,

you are seriously trying to compare Hilter w/ Castro and Che Guevara. Are you that blinded by the Commie hating right that you can’t see the difference between them?

Put your conservative republican bullshit aside and please, explain to me how you can even make such a comparison. I’d have a much easier time comparing Castro/Guevara with Ben-Gurion and Moshe Dayan than I would comparing Hilter and Castro/Guevara.

do you know anything factual about Cuban history, not what you read growing up in the fifties being brainwashed by Mccarthyism bullshit, but actual facts about what happened, why they revolted, etc. etc.

Sure they did some horrible things, but so did everyone else in the name of their freedom, but comparing those things to what Hilter did is absolutely ludicrous and irresponsible. You fascist!

By: Steve

Steve — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:13:39 +0000

“The Lucifer myth was transferred to Satan in the pre-Christian century…”

How does that square with Saint Lucifer a Bishop in the early Christian church living in the fourth century AD (I previously said second century. I was mistaken.)

He was a man of G-d and surely wouldn’t have taken on the name of the Devil so somehow at least in his part of the world the name “Lucifer” didn’t have Satanic connotations back then.

By: froylein

froylein — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:49:35 +0000

Kirk / Steve / [monosyllabic first name of your choice]-invasion again?

A little reading on Lucifer..

Oh, and I’m sorry we don’t live up to Done’s expectations anymore. If people were so kind as to shove over the cash to finance their favourite bloggers, there’d be more blogging on demand.

By: Kirk

Kirk — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:32:59 +0000

Could someone define the word “racist” for me?

No, seriously as it has been abused and misused over years so it would be helpful to have a PRECISE definition of the word for this discussion so we are all on the same page here.

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:27:27 +0000

They support people like Che Guava, Fidel Castro, the Weather Underground and Louis Farrakhan.

Why don’t you ask what are they smoking?

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:25:08 +0000

Cris the name “Lucifer” didn’t always mean “the Devil”.

In Latin, the word “Lucifer”, meaning “Light-Bringer” (from lux, lucis, “light”, and ferre, “to bear, bring”), is a name for the “Morning Star” (the planet Venus in its dawn appearances).

I don’t know when the word Lucifer forever became a synonym for the Devil but as late as the 2nd century AD it sure wasn’t because there is even a Christian saint from that time named Saint Lucifer and obviously he wouldn’t have taken on or kept that name had there been such a strong connection back then between the name Lucifer and the Devil. That must have occurred later on.