<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a Jewish Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261895</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261895</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I said it is in their culture and religion to lie, there is a difference. The difference being that, Arabs born and raised in the middle east or isolated middle eastern communities in the west have that trait.&lt;/i&gt;

So what is that if not a generalizing statement towards native Arabic people?

Would that be innate or acquired dishonesty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I said it is in their culture and religion to lie, there is a difference. The difference being that, Arabs born and raised in the middle east or isolated middle eastern communities in the west have that trait.</i></p>
<p>So what is that if not a generalizing statement towards native Arabic people?</p>
<p>Would that be innate or acquired dishonesty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261786</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261786</guid>
		<description>Torontonian: I think we make about $300 a year from the sale of t-shirts. That doesn&#039;t pay for three weeks of server time and bandwidth. Most of the people that attend our Festival pay $36. That doesn&#039;t cover one day&#039;s worth of their food, let alone facility rentals, speaker and program expenses etc. Most of our ads are for Jewish non-profit entities. All of us write for free because we&#039;re passionate about whatever version of Judaism we associate with. If Jewlicious is a commercial enterprise, well then... we really suck at that despite the Jews proclivity for commercial activity. Torontonian, I suggest you take criticism in stride. We often disagree with each other and far more vociferously. So yeah, there you have it. I&#039;m sure Moses would have far more important things to do than to throw tablets at the likes of us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torontonian: I think we make about $300 a year from the sale of t-shirts. That doesn&#8217;t pay for three weeks of server time and bandwidth. Most of the people that attend our Festival pay $36. That doesn&#8217;t cover one day&#8217;s worth of their food, let alone facility rentals, speaker and program expenses etc. Most of our ads are for Jewish non-profit entities. All of us write for free because we&#8217;re passionate about whatever version of Judaism we associate with. If Jewlicious is a commercial enterprise, well then&#8230; we really suck at that despite the Jews proclivity for commercial activity. Torontonian, I suggest you take criticism in stride. We often disagree with each other and far more vociferously. So yeah, there you have it. I&#8217;m sure Moses would have far more important things to do than to throw tablets at the likes of us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261760</link>
		<dc:creator>themiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261760</guid>
		<description>Torontonian, you seem to have a very hard time analyzing information, so let me help you. This site generates little revenue overall. We do this for free. That means that we write for free, we debate with you for free and we accept your abuse for free.

That&#039;s pretty Jewlicious of us, don&#039;t you think? 

Sure, some money is generated to feed the hamsters and permit one person to keep his lungs filled with unhealthy stuff but not much more. 

Actually, we are a group of writers from different backgrounds and places trying to express ourselves regarding the Jewish world. It&#039;s not a professional exercise although sometimes our pieces are good enough to be published and sometimes they deserve to be thrown out with the garbage. It&#039;s supposed to be a positive view of the Jewish world and of Israel although we also criticize elements of both. 

The reason you are angry at us is that we refuse to buy bigoted statements you made. You thought you&#039;d have colleagues and instead you met opponents. That happens here when we get people from the farther reaches of the Right. We try to treat other groups the way that Jews would like to be treated. That is, treated with fairness and without prejudice. I don&#039;t have many Arab friends and that&#039;s because generally there is a serious divide between those Arabs I know and our views about the Middle East. However, I see their views as the problem, not some inherent flaws of character or nature as you&#039;ve described. 

You may wish to revisit your comments above and replace the word Arab with the word Jew and see what happens. I don&#039;t think you&#039;re going to be proud.

You are welcome to stay here or leave. If you stay, I ask that you tone down the rhetoric against particular groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torontonian, you seem to have a very hard time analyzing information, so let me help you. This site generates little revenue overall. We do this for free. That means that we write for free, we debate with you for free and we accept your abuse for free.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty Jewlicious of us, don&#8217;t you think? </p>
<p>Sure, some money is generated to feed the hamsters and permit one person to keep his lungs filled with unhealthy stuff but not much more. </p>
<p>Actually, we are a group of writers from different backgrounds and places trying to express ourselves regarding the Jewish world. It&#8217;s not a professional exercise although sometimes our pieces are good enough to be published and sometimes they deserve to be thrown out with the garbage. It&#8217;s supposed to be a positive view of the Jewish world and of Israel although we also criticize elements of both. </p>
<p>The reason you are angry at us is that we refuse to buy bigoted statements you made. You thought you&#8217;d have colleagues and instead you met opponents. That happens here when we get people from the farther reaches of the Right. We try to treat other groups the way that Jews would like to be treated. That is, treated with fairness and without prejudice. I don&#8217;t have many Arab friends and that&#8217;s because generally there is a serious divide between those Arabs I know and our views about the Middle East. However, I see their views as the problem, not some inherent flaws of character or nature as you&#8217;ve described. </p>
<p>You may wish to revisit your comments above and replace the word Arab with the word Jew and see what happens. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re going to be proud.</p>
<p>You are welcome to stay here or leave. If you stay, I ask that you tone down the rhetoric against particular groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261680</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261680</guid>
		<description>Actually, to be exact. I belittled an entire ethnicity based on its religion, not it&#039;s geographical background. Maybe I can&#039;t write, but you sure can&#039;t read.

Xenophobia is the &quot;fear&quot; of strangers. So what am I? A hater or someone who fears?  What if you only hate one stranger, but not the rest are you still xenophobic?

I am of Middle Eastern origin myself, so by your terms I hate my own people?

I&#039;m sorry but you&#039;re so full of bullshit, I am starting to laugh here. This went from a serious thread to pure meaningless entertainment.

Everyone else here? You mean the target audience you have here who don&#039;t realize this site is 70% advertisements, a swag store, and a festival with a 30% core product value based on a blog that you call &quot;journalism&quot;? Please. The fact that you commercialize Judaism, and are trying to sell &quot;cool jew&quot; bling necklaces (For a low price of $49! holiday special!) is an insult in itself to Judaism. I consider you and anyone else on here far from Jewish. Leave it to LA &quot;jews&quot; to materialize the religion, something totally against Judaism. This reminds me of Moses throwing the tablets at the &quot;jews&quot; who were worshiping idols. Go worship your cool jew necklaces and swag and your material life style.

Ta-ta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, to be exact. I belittled an entire ethnicity based on its religion, not it&#8217;s geographical background. Maybe I can&#8217;t write, but you sure can&#8217;t read.</p>
<p>Xenophobia is the &#8220;fear&#8221; of strangers. So what am I? A hater or someone who fears?  What if you only hate one stranger, but not the rest are you still xenophobic?</p>
<p>I am of Middle Eastern origin myself, so by your terms I hate my own people?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but you&#8217;re so full of bullshit, I am starting to laugh here. This went from a serious thread to pure meaningless entertainment.</p>
<p>Everyone else here? You mean the target audience you have here who don&#8217;t realize this site is 70% advertisements, a swag store, and a festival with a 30% core product value based on a blog that you call &#8220;journalism&#8221;? Please. The fact that you commercialize Judaism, and are trying to sell &#8220;cool jew&#8221; bling necklaces (For a low price of $49! holiday special!) is an insult in itself to Judaism. I consider you and anyone else on here far from Jewish. Leave it to LA &#8220;jews&#8221; to materialize the religion, something totally against Judaism. This reminds me of Moses throwing the tablets at the &#8220;jews&#8221; who were worshiping idols. Go worship your cool jew necklaces and swag and your material life style.</p>
<p>Ta-ta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261672</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261672</guid>
		<description>English is my third language, and proper spelling remains a matter of politeness. Since you felt free to belittle an entire ethnicity based on its geographical background, I felt my mentioning of your orthography was rather on point. And since you still don&#039;t get that ethnicity and religious adherence are two different matters and you generously conflate the two as it fits your limited understanding of the world, trying to invoke uncalled for fear in others by introducing gross generalizations of decidedly racist quality, I dare say xenophobia is the apt expression to describe your attitude towards people of Middle Eastern origin (which, as it apparently has escaped your attention, includes the majority of Jews).

I think we&#039;ve given your racism enough airtime on here to unfold itself well enough for everybody to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English is my third language, and proper spelling remains a matter of politeness. Since you felt free to belittle an entire ethnicity based on its geographical background, I felt my mentioning of your orthography was rather on point. And since you still don&#8217;t get that ethnicity and religious adherence are two different matters and you generously conflate the two as it fits your limited understanding of the world, trying to invoke uncalled for fear in others by introducing gross generalizations of decidedly racist quality, I dare say xenophobia is the apt expression to describe your attitude towards people of Middle Eastern origin (which, as it apparently has escaped your attention, includes the majority of Jews).</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ve given your racism enough airtime on here to unfold itself well enough for everybody to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261666</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261666</guid>
		<description>Sorry for not using spell check on a &quot;Jewlicious&quot; comment section. Again, another logical facility, attacking the speaker rather than the idea. The lowest of all forms of disagreement (ranked LF0 out of 10). Congratulations, you&#039;ve reached a new low. Considering English is my second language, I write far better than the average domestically raised American.

Seems like your last comment doesn&#039;t have any arguments in it, just questions and opinions. I&#039;ve taken you&#039;ve forfeited.
 

Good luck in life, especially when the Arabs come after you for being a Jew. I hope you defend them like you did today. I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll care before they force you to convert or face death.

I don&#039;t fear foreigners or strangers, I don&#039;t fear Arabs. So there&#039;s no phobia there, just a partial xeno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for not using spell check on a &#8220;Jewlicious&#8221; comment section. Again, another logical facility, attacking the speaker rather than the idea. The lowest of all forms of disagreement (ranked LF0 out of 10). Congratulations, you&#8217;ve reached a new low. Considering English is my second language, I write far better than the average domestically raised American.</p>
<p>Seems like your last comment doesn&#8217;t have any arguments in it, just questions and opinions. I&#8217;ve taken you&#8217;ve forfeited.</p>
<p>Good luck in life, especially when the Arabs come after you for being a Jew. I hope you defend them like you did today. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll care before they force you to convert or face death.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t fear foreigners or strangers, I don&#8217;t fear Arabs. So there&#8217;s no phobia there, just a partial xeno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261660</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261660</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how they let people that cannot even spell enrol at colleges. Apparently you haven&#039;t got the slightest clue whatsoever as to who writes encyclopaedia entries. 

I&#039;m supposed to accept thinly veiled bias, unequivocally false assertions on the matter in question and obviously one-sided websites as authoritative, but may not explain why an open source web 2.0 reference site does not compare to the world&#039;s leading and most reputable encyclopaedia that has been compiled by not only editors but experts of standing?

How much more ridiculous can you possibly get? 

Do you even know the core values of Islam, even of an idealized, true-to-the-book version? 

If anything, you&#039;ve proved your xenophobia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how they let people that cannot even spell enrol at colleges. Apparently you haven&#8217;t got the slightest clue whatsoever as to who writes encyclopaedia entries. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m supposed to accept thinly veiled bias, unequivocally false assertions on the matter in question and obviously one-sided websites as authoritative, but may not explain why an open source web 2.0 reference site does not compare to the world&#8217;s leading and most reputable encyclopaedia that has been compiled by not only editors but experts of standing?</p>
<p>How much more ridiculous can you possibly get? </p>
<p>Do you even know the core values of Islam, even of an idealized, true-to-the-book version? </p>
<p>If anything, you&#8217;ve proved your xenophobia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261656</link>
		<dc:creator>themiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261656</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, you haven&#039;t convinced me of anything. Fyi, when Barak said that you can&#039;t trust the Arabs because they are liars, it was one of the stupidest things he could have ever said, if only because he&#039;s a former PM and speaks with the authority of one.

I still don&#039;t understand how a culture teaches all of its members to lie and I don&#039;t see how making that statement is different than saying all Jews have a nose for business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, you haven&#8217;t convinced me of anything. Fyi, when Barak said that you can&#8217;t trust the Arabs because they are liars, it was one of the stupidest things he could have ever said, if only because he&#8217;s a former PM and speaks with the authority of one.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand how a culture teaches all of its members to lie and I don&#8217;t see how making that statement is different than saying all Jews have a nose for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261646</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261646</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t even get me started about what is scientifically &quot;traceable&quot; or &quot;challengeable knowledge&quot;. You speak as everything you say is an absolute truth. There is no such thing as absolute truth, even science in itself is somewhat broken. If it wasn&#039;t we would have had universal string theory by now.  Why don&#039;t you read a Murray Gelman book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started about what is scientifically &#8220;traceable&#8221; or &#8220;challengeable knowledge&#8221;. You speak as everything you say is an absolute truth. There is no such thing as absolute truth, even science in itself is somewhat broken. If it wasn&#8217;t we would have had universal string theory by now.  Why don&#8217;t you read a Murray Gelman book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261644</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261644</guid>
		<description>If I referenced encycolpedia Britannica in my undergraduate or my masters degree program, I would have failed. My program required strictly referencing Scholars, not anything else. Also, just because one set of institutions forbids something, it doesn&#039;t mean its not credible. The FBI and the RCMP believe that tasers don&#039;t cause homicide, instead it is caused by &quot;excited delerium&quot;, which is false, does that make what they say correct?  My point is you&#039;re committing a logical fallacy by appealing to authority, whether it is universities, or the government. So your premise is inherently false until you can provide some solid evidence.

Yes Islam did start in the 600&#039;s, but according to anthropologists their cultural traits even precede Zoroastrianism.

Got any other arguments I can debunk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I referenced encycolpedia Britannica in my undergraduate or my masters degree program, I would have failed. My program required strictly referencing Scholars, not anything else. Also, just because one set of institutions forbids something, it doesn&#8217;t mean its not credible. The FBI and the RCMP believe that tasers don&#8217;t cause homicide, instead it is caused by &#8220;excited delerium&#8221;, which is false, does that make what they say correct?  My point is you&#8217;re committing a logical fallacy by appealing to authority, whether it is universities, or the government. So your premise is inherently false until you can provide some solid evidence.</p>
<p>Yes Islam did start in the 600&#8242;s, but according to anthropologists their cultural traits even precede Zoroastrianism.</p>
<p>Got any other arguments I can debunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261642</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261642</guid>
		<description>At least I don&#039;t confuse arbitrary assumptions with scientifically traceable and also challengeable knowledge.

An opinion does not a sage make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least I don&#8217;t confuse arbitrary assumptions with scientifically traceable and also challengeable knowledge.</p>
<p>An opinion does not a sage make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261636</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261636</guid>
		<description>Wiki is rejected because it&#039;s not a proper research tool, it&#039;s as simple as that. It does in no way compare to, for instance, the Encyclopaedia Britannica (which also updates its entries daily; those updates are available to subscribers, owners of the print version or users of the DVD version), but they actually have got experts working on their entries. There are scientific magazines as well as there are scientific journals; each denotes a different kind of publication.

I&#039;ve seen observant Jews (as you were arguing from / against the angle of observant Muslims as opposed to non-observant, Westernized ones) use violence against brethren that they believed to have violated Jewish laws. Islam, BTW, started in 622 CE. If you already use Wiki as a source of information, you should at the very least scroll down the pages to get the gist of the entries. In 150 AD [raher 150 CE, as we prefer to say on here], the Middle East as well as most parts of inhabited Europe were under Roman occupation.

Beati pauperes spiritu..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiki is rejected because it&#8217;s not a proper research tool, it&#8217;s as simple as that. It does in no way compare to, for instance, the Encyclopaedia Britannica (which also updates its entries daily; those updates are available to subscribers, owners of the print version or users of the DVD version), but they actually have got experts working on their entries. There are scientific magazines as well as there are scientific journals; each denotes a different kind of publication.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen observant Jews (as you were arguing from / against the angle of observant Muslims as opposed to non-observant, Westernized ones) use violence against brethren that they believed to have violated Jewish laws. Islam, BTW, started in 622 CE. If you already use Wiki as a source of information, you should at the very least scroll down the pages to get the gist of the entries. In 150 AD [raher 150 CE, as we prefer to say on here], the Middle East as well as most parts of inhabited Europe were under Roman occupation.</p>
<p>Beati pauperes spiritu..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261633</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261633</guid>
		<description>You are no different than the label happy, over stimulated, short attention span, late generation who thinks they are educated because they went through what they call a three to four year university program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are no different than the label happy, over stimulated, short attention span, late generation who thinks they are educated because they went through what they call a three to four year university program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261624</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261624</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you go ahead and try to edit a Wikipedia entry and see what happens? Within seconds 1) the Wiki bot will send your changes to a moderator for moderation 2) If the moderator disapproves, your change is immediately reversed. Go ahead, try it for yourself.

If you only knew how much traffic Wikipedia receives a minute. Look at all the changes in the last 10 seconds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges

There are people who watch every change and immediately fix errors.

Second, Universities don&#039;t reject Wikipedia because it&#039;s a &quot;toy&quot;. The reason they do so is because referencing encyclopedia is not an acceptable University level source. Most books aren&#039;t acceptable University level source either, let alone &quot;Magazines&quot;, which is why most Universities and professors require you use Academic journals which are maintained by approved and known databases or libraries. So your argument holds no relevance to the credibility of Wikipedia.

I have read the Torah, and I am well familiar with Moses laws such as stoning a belligerent child.  The owning of slaves, and so forth. However, do you see any common modern day Jews practicing these laws? That&#039;s the difference between Judaism and Islam, once is adjusted for 2009, the other for 150AD. Ask Wafa Sultan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you go ahead and try to edit a Wikipedia entry and see what happens? Within seconds 1) the Wiki bot will send your changes to a moderator for moderation 2) If the moderator disapproves, your change is immediately reversed. Go ahead, try it for yourself.</p>
<p>If you only knew how much traffic Wikipedia receives a minute. Look at all the changes in the last 10 seconds. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges'>en.wikipedia.o...</a></p>
<p>There are people who watch every change and immediately fix errors.</p>
<p>Second, Universities don&#8217;t reject Wikipedia because it&#8217;s a &#8220;toy&#8221;. The reason they do so is because referencing encyclopedia is not an acceptable University level source. Most books aren&#8217;t acceptable University level source either, let alone &#8220;Magazines&#8221;, which is why most Universities and professors require you use Academic journals which are maintained by approved and known databases or libraries. So your argument holds no relevance to the credibility of Wikipedia.</p>
<p>I have read the Torah, and I am well familiar with Moses laws such as stoning a belligerent child.  The owning of slaves, and so forth. However, do you see any common modern day Jews practicing these laws? That&#8217;s the difference between Judaism and Islam, once is adjusted for 2009, the other for 150AD. Ask Wafa Sultan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261623</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261623</guid>
		<description>I could start enumerating a long range of books on Islam and comparative religious and Middle Eastern political studies, but would that make you access a library? Your point-of-view has obviously been soldified by sources that I&#039;d call dubious to say the very least. In addition, your condescending allegations do not do your alleged civility in discourse justice. Thus, you are not different from a large deal of haters we&#039;ve seen on here, and I find your ill-informed xenophobia rather annoying.

Middle shall fare with you as he pleases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could start enumerating a long range of books on Islam and comparative religious and Middle Eastern political studies, but would that make you access a library? Your point-of-view has obviously been soldified by sources that I&#8217;d call dubious to say the very least. In addition, your condescending allegations do not do your alleged civility in discourse justice. Thus, you are not different from a large deal of haters we&#8217;ve seen on here, and I find your ill-informed xenophobia rather annoying.</p>
<p>Middle shall fare with you as he pleases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261615</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261615</guid>
		<description>For your information, anybody with internet accesss can edit Wiki entries. Anybody also includes a large share of clueless people; actual specialists prefer to publish scientific books or articles in scientific magazines, which, in general, are reviewed by at least one more reputable researcher on the matter and the editor of the publication. There&#039;s a reason why an increasing number of colleges and universities in the US have established policies to reject or fail papers that use Wikipedia as a source. It&#039;s a toy, not a tool.

I&#039;m aware that Islam justifies forceful missionary work and its set of laws, sharia, does include verdicts that appear bewildering to Westerners, but I take it you haven&#039;t read the Torah either, otherwise you&#039;d know that many kind of punishment Judaism knows for various kinds of transgressions would be considered over-the-top and too violent by today&#039;s Western standards. 

I read about that man. Today, we celebrated a holiday that allegedly commemorates the death of tens of thousands innocents at the hands of Jews (no worries, it&#039;s just a story). Judaism even knows a king that had another man sent to his certain death to get ahold of that man&#039;s wife. How does that fare with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your information, anybody with internet accesss can edit Wiki entries. Anybody also includes a large share of clueless people; actual specialists prefer to publish scientific books or articles in scientific magazines, which, in general, are reviewed by at least one more reputable researcher on the matter and the editor of the publication. There&#8217;s a reason why an increasing number of colleges and universities in the US have established policies to reject or fail papers that use Wikipedia as a source. It&#8217;s a toy, not a tool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m aware that Islam justifies forceful missionary work and its set of laws, sharia, does include verdicts that appear bewildering to Westerners, but I take it you haven&#8217;t read the Torah either, otherwise you&#8217;d know that many kind of punishment Judaism knows for various kinds of transgressions would be considered over-the-top and too violent by today&#8217;s Western standards. </p>
<p>I read about that man. Today, we celebrated a holiday that allegedly commemorates the death of tens of thousands innocents at the hands of Jews (no worries, it&#8217;s just a story). Judaism even knows a king that had another man sent to his certain death to get ahold of that man&#8217;s wife. How does that fare with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261608</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261608</guid>
		<description>Also, you seem to have not understood my point, or perhaps I was not specific enough. I didn&#039;t mean that religious Arabs are more observant than Orthodox/Religious Jews. I meant that Arabs are far more observant than Jews in the context that the percentage of religious Arabs compared to religious Jews is far more higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, you seem to have not understood my point, or perhaps I was not specific enough. I didn&#8217;t mean that religious Arabs are more observant than Orthodox/Religious Jews. I meant that Arabs are far more observant than Jews in the context that the percentage of religious Arabs compared to religious Jews is far more higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261597</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261597</guid>
		<description>Who said I was a &quot;proper researcher&quot;?  I assure you, my comment thus far hold far more weight than yours or anyone else who has commented they aren&#039;t even giving any evidence, any sources, or any facts.

If that&#039;s all you can say as your defense, you&#039;re no different than Tiff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said I was a &#8220;proper researcher&#8221;?  I assure you, my comment thus far hold far more weight than yours or anyone else who has commented they aren&#8217;t even giving any evidence, any sources, or any facts.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s all you can say as your defense, you&#8217;re no different than Tiff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontorian</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261593</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261593</guid>
		<description>Froylein,

For your information, Wikipedia is statistically the most credible encyclopedia existing to date since it is constantly corrected and updated by the half second. You act like you are completely oblivious to their violent religious education.  Where do you think they learn to behead? Where do you think they get these ideas? You think they just appear out of thin air? It is all religious, just like American ethics derive mainly from the bible. Have you seen this article? http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Froylein,</p>
<p>For your information, Wikipedia is statistically the most credible encyclopedia existing to date since it is constantly corrected and updated by the half second. You act like you are completely oblivious to their violent religious education.  Where do you think they learn to behead? Where do you think they get these ideas? You think they just appear out of thin air? It is all religious, just like American ethics derive mainly from the bible. Have you seen this article? <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/'>cnn.com/2009/C...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froylein</title>
		<link>http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/03/oh-canada/#comment-1261591</link>
		<dc:creator>froylein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=7413#comment-1261591</guid>
		<description>Proper researchers don&#039;t reference Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper researchers don&#8217;t reference Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

